Comments on: Hill to Visit Celts

By: bmathews77

bmathews77 — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:07:46 +0000

That would be a great addition to the Celtics if they can sign Grant Hill for cheap. They already got Rasheed Wallace and he’s going to help them out alot. Not bad if they have Rasheed Wallace and Grant Hill coming off the bench. Then all they have to do is get Glen Davis signed and they’re good to go for a championship run barring any major injuries again.

By: jho

jho — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 01:46:06 +0000

I don’t want Hill on this team. Unless we’re getting Nash a year early and he wants a friendly face along for the ride.

By: italian stallion

italian stallion — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:12:48 +0000

I like Hill a lot and think he has enough left in the tank to help some team out, but I’m not sure what he brings to the Knicks. We already have plenty of forwards in his role. Unless Chandler is going to be traded, I don’t see the point…….and I don’t see the point to trading Chandler unless we are bringing a young stud to play Guard.

By: Knicks4lyfe8

Knicks4lyfe8 — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:07:46 +0000

couldn’t have said it better myself…^^^

If Nash comes to NY, Im saying we get 45 wins and 6th seed.

By: BiggieSmalls

BiggieSmalls — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:06:48 +0000

Q Rich set a horrible example with his off the court behavior and his lack of a winning attitude. Malik had the winning pedigree but couldnt play a lick,

Im OK with some vet leadership but Not Grant Hill. Im in the Nash camp./ Less so for Kidd from a physical standpoint.

By: joetheknick

joetheknick — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 14:32:51 +0000

I don’t understand this recent interest in veteran leadership. First it was Kidd and now it is Hill. We had veteran leadership in Malik Rose and in Quentin Richardson and it did not seem to make a big difference in performance. I think the Knicks will getting better by establishing a rotation without glaring holes and then a lot of team practice. Your thoughts