<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What makes most sense for the Wolves?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/07/05/what-makes-most-sense-for-the-wolves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/07/05/what-makes-most-sense-for-the-wolves/</link>
	<description>The One-Stop Shop for Hopeful Knick Fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:30:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qaspec</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/07/05/what-makes-most-sense-for-the-wolves/#comment-49345</link>
		<dc:creator>Qaspec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=8278#comment-49345</guid>
		<description>Supposedly we&#039;re being told that Gallo had &quot;succesful&quot; back surgery so we&#039;ll see on that one.....

Curry&#039;s real problem seems to be that he doesn&#039;t have the fire to be a professional NBA player, I mean how do you lazy besides making every year a contract year?

Lee is a good hustle player who has one major glaring weakness and thats defense. Who knows if it&#039;s an athleticism thing or not...

The problem to me with immaturity is the unpredictable nature of it. Does he fix it easily? (Possible) 
Does a light bulb turn on for him someday? (Possible)
How long does it take weeks? months? years? (all possible)

Then you have guys like Marbury who never got it and ended up alienating himself from everyone never reaching his full potential. Could Nate end up like that? (Also Possible)

I think that&#039;s why I&#039;d love to see him play for the qualifying offer this year to see if he can grow and mature like so many if his supporters believe in. He is so talented which is why it&#039;s so frustrating to see his negative emotions take hold of him and keep him back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supposedly we&#8217;re being told that Gallo had &#8220;succesful&#8221; back surgery so we&#8217;ll see on that one&#8230;..</p>
<p>Curry&#8217;s real problem seems to be that he doesn&#8217;t have the fire to be a professional NBA player, I mean how do you lazy besides making every year a contract year?</p>
<p>Lee is a good hustle player who has one major glaring weakness and thats defense. Who knows if it&#8217;s an athleticism thing or not&#8230;</p>
<p>The problem to me with immaturity is the unpredictable nature of it. Does he fix it easily? (Possible)<br />
Does a light bulb turn on for him someday? (Possible)<br />
How long does it take weeks? months? years? (all possible)</p>
<p>Then you have guys like Marbury who never got it and ended up alienating himself from everyone never reaching his full potential. Could Nate end up like that? (Also Possible)</p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s why I&#8217;d love to see him play for the qualifying offer this year to see if he can grow and mature like so many if his supporters believe in. He is so talented which is why it&#8217;s so frustrating to see his negative emotions take hold of him and keep him back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/07/05/what-makes-most-sense-for-the-wolves/#comment-49334</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=8278#comment-49334</guid>
		<description>I disagree. You don&#039;t give up on a player after a year. D&#039;Antoni&#039;s had Nate for exactly one year. He&#039;s had lots of ups and downs, but when he was on, no player on the Knicks was better. Another year will do wonders for his maturity. I think he&#039;ll grow up pretty fast cuz he knows how fast he came/is to being traded this summer.

Again, in comparison to Lee, Curry, Gallinari, his &quot;problem&quot; is the most fixable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. You don&#8217;t give up on a player after a year. D&#8217;Antoni&#8217;s had Nate for exactly one year. He&#8217;s had lots of ups and downs, but when he was on, no player on the Knicks was better. Another year will do wonders for his maturity. I think he&#8217;ll grow up pretty fast cuz he knows how fast he came/is to being traded this summer.</p>
<p>Again, in comparison to Lee, Curry, Gallinari, his &#8220;problem&#8221; is the most fixable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qaspec</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/07/05/what-makes-most-sense-for-the-wolves/#comment-49331</link>
		<dc:creator>Qaspec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=8278#comment-49331</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the long a$$ posts everybody....looks like a Simmons column.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the long a$$ posts everybody&#8230;.looks like a Simmons column.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qaspec</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/07/05/what-makes-most-sense-for-the-wolves/#comment-49329</link>
		<dc:creator>Qaspec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=8278#comment-49329</guid>
		<description>And just an observation, but for those games that were mentioned above that were an example of Nate being great in this system, I would respectfully  disagree with that assessment. 

I watched a couple of those exceptional Nate games and the reason why Dantoni was frustrated even after winning the game was because Nate wasn&#039;t playing SSOL. Nate was playing more of the isolation game that Cleveland relies on every 4th quarter and playoffs with Lebron in that role of dribbler, dominating the ball at the top of the 3pt line, taking his man off the dribble for a drive to the lane or a jab step jump shot.

Nate getting his own shot isn&#039;t Dantoni&#039;s offense and even though it worked for those specific games it was not part of the system. The system relies on movement, cutting, filling lanes and timely spot up shooting. Those are not things that Nate does consistently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And just an observation, but for those games that were mentioned above that were an example of Nate being great in this system, I would respectfully  disagree with that assessment. </p>
<p>I watched a couple of those exceptional Nate games and the reason why Dantoni was frustrated even after winning the game was because Nate wasn&#8217;t playing SSOL. Nate was playing more of the isolation game that Cleveland relies on every 4th quarter and playoffs with Lebron in that role of dribbler, dominating the ball at the top of the 3pt line, taking his man off the dribble for a drive to the lane or a jab step jump shot.</p>
<p>Nate getting his own shot isn&#8217;t Dantoni&#8217;s offense and even though it worked for those specific games it was not part of the system. The system relies on movement, cutting, filling lanes and timely spot up shooting. Those are not things that Nate does consistently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qaspec</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/07/05/what-makes-most-sense-for-the-wolves/#comment-49322</link>
		<dc:creator>Qaspec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=8278#comment-49322</guid>
		<description>We all know Nate has the physical talent. &quot;The Guy&quot; posted that immaturity is fixable. The real truth is that immaturity is the hardest thing to fix. With immaturity, comes pride and also the penchant to be defensive to constructive criticism.  Immaturity can only be fixed if a person decides to change.

I don&#039;t equate Nate&#039;s celebrations, enthusiasm and competitive nature as immaturity. I think it&#039;s great and I love the emotion. The immaturity is the inability to stabilize that emotion when it becomes negative. 

Dantoni knows Nate has a world of talent and while he physically would make a great PG in Seven Seconds or Less (SSOL). The problem is that SSOL isn&#039;t simply about TAKING a shot before the defense sets. For the guards it&#039;s about SETTING up the best shot before the defense sets. Nate isn&#039;t known to set up teammates consistently and he tends to dominate the ball and take ill advised shots.

Nate is a scorer. A very talented guy that can fill up the points column. I would be so happy if he stayed with the Knicks and had a court vision epiphany and looked to set up teammates instead of scoring first and played defense on the ball like the second coming of Mugsy Bogues he would win a couple league MVP&#039;s.

It seemed to me though that as many games this team won due to Nate last year the team also won despite Nate. He absolutely brings it 120% effort wise every night but his focus and results do not have similiar consistency. Part of that reason is Nate plays from gut instinct. That is not SSOL at all. SSOL for being fast paced is actually calculated and in the half court the high post pick and roll is something Nate struggles with.  

Sometimes a player needs a change of scenery to reach that full potential. A different coaches philosophy, a different team concept. Dantoni and Nate do have issues with each other that is apparent by many of the comments between the two in the media and Nate&#039;s aversion to changing any asppect of his game. 

I actually believe that a better fit for Nate would be Golden State. Nellie&#039;s fast break offense is all about natural instinct, and reaction. Nate would thrive in that scenario. For the Knicks it&#039;s a little more difficult for Nate to reach his ultimate potential because the team needs a specific type of point guard and scoring is a product of the installed offense not one-on-one. Because of the smaller size of Dantoni&#039;s SSOL teams a 5&#039;9 guard no matter how athletic becomes magnified in a rebounding and defensive perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know Nate has the physical talent. &#8220;The Guy&#8221; posted that immaturity is fixable. The real truth is that immaturity is the hardest thing to fix. With immaturity, comes pride and also the penchant to be defensive to constructive criticism.  Immaturity can only be fixed if a person decides to change.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t equate Nate&#8217;s celebrations, enthusiasm and competitive nature as immaturity. I think it&#8217;s great and I love the emotion. The immaturity is the inability to stabilize that emotion when it becomes negative. </p>
<p>Dantoni knows Nate has a world of talent and while he physically would make a great PG in Seven Seconds or Less (SSOL). The problem is that SSOL isn&#8217;t simply about TAKING a shot before the defense sets. For the guards it&#8217;s about SETTING up the best shot before the defense sets. Nate isn&#8217;t known to set up teammates consistently and he tends to dominate the ball and take ill advised shots.</p>
<p>Nate is a scorer. A very talented guy that can fill up the points column. I would be so happy if he stayed with the Knicks and had a court vision epiphany and looked to set up teammates instead of scoring first and played defense on the ball like the second coming of Mugsy Bogues he would win a couple league MVP&#8217;s.</p>
<p>It seemed to me though that as many games this team won due to Nate last year the team also won despite Nate. He absolutely brings it 120% effort wise every night but his focus and results do not have similiar consistency. Part of that reason is Nate plays from gut instinct. That is not SSOL at all. SSOL for being fast paced is actually calculated and in the half court the high post pick and roll is something Nate struggles with.  </p>
<p>Sometimes a player needs a change of scenery to reach that full potential. A different coaches philosophy, a different team concept. Dantoni and Nate do have issues with each other that is apparent by many of the comments between the two in the media and Nate&#8217;s aversion to changing any asppect of his game. </p>
<p>I actually believe that a better fit for Nate would be Golden State. Nellie&#8217;s fast break offense is all about natural instinct, and reaction. Nate would thrive in that scenario. For the Knicks it&#8217;s a little more difficult for Nate to reach his ultimate potential because the team needs a specific type of point guard and scoring is a product of the installed offense not one-on-one. Because of the smaller size of Dantoni&#8217;s SSOL teams a 5&#8217;9 guard no matter how athletic becomes magnified in a rebounding and defensive perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/07/05/what-makes-most-sense-for-the-wolves/#comment-49306</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=8278#comment-49306</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know about you, but I&#039;ve had back problems on and off for a long time. Backs are very tricky to heal. I agree that playing with a guy like Nash could do wonders for Nate. 

Looks like Jason Kidd is staying in Dallas though, as per ESPN.

Eddy Curry&#039;s problems are more than just his weight, and Lee&#039;s problems are more than just his defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about you, but I&#8217;ve had back problems on and off for a long time. Backs are very tricky to heal. I agree that playing with a guy like Nash could do wonders for Nate. </p>
<p>Looks like Jason Kidd is staying in Dallas though, as per ESPN.</p>
<p>Eddy Curry&#8217;s problems are more than just his weight, and Lee&#8217;s problems are more than just his defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CircleLimit4</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/07/05/what-makes-most-sense-for-the-wolves/#comment-49304</link>
		<dc:creator>CircleLimit4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=8278#comment-49304</guid>
		<description>Nate&#039;s immaturity is fixable. So is Eddy Curry&#039;s weight. The catch is that&#039;s something only Nate can fix. A specialist can heal Gallo&#039;s back. A coach or player can help improve Lee&#039;s defense. In these regards Nate is a master of his own destiny, more so than the aforementioned (except Curry.) 

A wise Vet to look up to could help though. I bet a Ray Allen or a Steve Nash would do him wonders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate&#8217;s immaturity is fixable. So is Eddy Curry&#8217;s weight. The catch is that&#8217;s something only Nate can fix. A specialist can heal Gallo&#8217;s back. A coach or player can help improve Lee&#8217;s defense. In these regards Nate is a master of his own destiny, more so than the aforementioned (except Curry.) </p>
<p>A wise Vet to look up to could help though. I bet a Ray Allen or a Steve Nash would do him wonders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/07/05/what-makes-most-sense-for-the-wolves/#comment-49301</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=8278#comment-49301</guid>
		<description>My point is, if being immature is his biggest problem, that&#039;s definitely something that&#039;s fixable. Danilo Gallinari having back surgery as a rookie is something that may or may not linger for the rest of his career. Even with a healthy back he may not ever be quick enough to be more than just a spot up shooter in the NBA, we don&#039;t know yet. His problems are not easily fixable.

Chris Duhon&#039;s mediocrity after 6 years in the league is not fixable.

David Lee&#039;s lack of defense, toughness, shotblocking, and go to scoring ability is not easily fixable.

Eddy Curry&#039;s lack of toughness, professionalism, and heart is unfixable.

Nate Robinson&#039;s immaturity you can fix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is, if being immature is his biggest problem, that&#8217;s definitely something that&#8217;s fixable. Danilo Gallinari having back surgery as a rookie is something that may or may not linger for the rest of his career. Even with a healthy back he may not ever be quick enough to be more than just a spot up shooter in the NBA, we don&#8217;t know yet. His problems are not easily fixable.</p>
<p>Chris Duhon&#8217;s mediocrity after 6 years in the league is not fixable.</p>
<p>David Lee&#8217;s lack of defense, toughness, shotblocking, and go to scoring ability is not easily fixable.</p>
<p>Eddy Curry&#8217;s lack of toughness, professionalism, and heart is unfixable.</p>
<p>Nate Robinson&#8217;s immaturity you can fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knicksbro</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/07/05/what-makes-most-sense-for-the-wolves/#comment-49298</link>
		<dc:creator>knicksbro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=8278#comment-49298</guid>
		<description>The problem with Nate is that he is too immature.  When he wants to, he can be a very good player and get the team involved.  Sometimes, we see that side of Nate and it is quite impressive.  However, he lacks the maturity to play like that all the time and that&#039;s why Dantoni gets upset with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Nate is that he is too immature.  When he wants to, he can be a very good player and get the team involved.  Sometimes, we see that side of Nate and it is quite impressive.  However, he lacks the maturity to play like that all the time and that&#8217;s why Dantoni gets upset with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/07/05/what-makes-most-sense-for-the-wolves/#comment-49297</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=8278#comment-49297</guid>
		<description>Hey the kid is what, 25 yrs old? Let&#039;s cut him a little slack. Plus again, every year he&#039;s been in the league he&#039;s had to adjust a new coach and a new system.  Nate Robinson with a yr under his belt under Mike D&#039;Antoni could very well have a phenomenal year. 

I hope the Knicks do the right thing and keep him here. I&#039;d love to have a homegrown Knick here when this team finally turns it around. I agree with the poster that said that Nate will shine in the playoffs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey the kid is what, 25 yrs old? Let&#8217;s cut him a little slack. Plus again, every year he&#8217;s been in the league he&#8217;s had to adjust a new coach and a new system.  Nate Robinson with a yr under his belt under Mike D&#8217;Antoni could very well have a phenomenal year. </p>
<p>I hope the Knicks do the right thing and keep him here. I&#8217;d love to have a homegrown Knick here when this team finally turns it around. I agree with the poster that said that Nate will shine in the playoffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 2/5 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 291/292 objects using memcached

Served from: www.theknicksblog.com @ 2012-02-11 19:29:30 -->
