Comments on: Rookie has Up-Hill Battle http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/08/rookie-has-up-hill-battle/ The One-Stop Shop for Hopeful Knick Fans Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:30:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Mucha http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/08/rookie-has-up-hill-battle/#comment-76992 Mucha Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:06:54 +0000 http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=10671#comment-76992 He does have bad hands. He does have bad hands.

]]> By: HaS http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/08/rookie-has-up-hill-battle/#comment-76968 HaS Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:56:55 +0000 http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=10671#comment-76968 Hill seems like he has bad hands. Hill seems like he has bad hands.

]]> By: Its The Kid http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/08/rookie-has-up-hill-battle/#comment-76947 Its The Kid Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:19:08 +0000 http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=10671#comment-76947 "Deep Thoughts" from a guy who spells It's with a Z and young without an O ha... “Deep Thoughts” from a guy who spells It’s with a Z and young without an O ha…

]]> By: itzyung1 http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/08/rookie-has-up-hill-battle/#comment-76902 itzyung1 Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:46:20 +0000 http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=10671#comment-76902 Somethings Very Clear Alright......especially after reading that mess. Somethings Very Clear Alright……especially after reading that mess.

]]> By: HaS http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/08/rookie-has-up-hill-battle/#comment-76901 HaS Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:39:52 +0000 http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=10671#comment-76901 That's Tommy, you gotta love him. He either hates Jennings or he just loves Walsh to much to question him. How about _'antoni who was a player and coach in Italy, couldn't get a feel for this guy's work ethic and willingness to listen from his contacts over there? He has to know someone who could at least get 2nd hand information on the kid. He shouldn't have been a surprise to him. Isn't he the scout? That’s Tommy, you gotta love him. He either hates Jennings or he just loves Walsh to much to question him. How about _’antoni who was a player and coach in Italy, couldn’t get a feel for this guy’s work ethic and willingness to listen from his contacts over there? He has to know someone who could at least get 2nd hand information on the kid. He shouldn’t have been a surprise to him.

Isn’t he the scout?

]]> By: Its The Kid http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/08/rookie-has-up-hill-battle/#comment-76888 Its The Kid Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:54:11 +0000 http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=10671#comment-76888 I felt the same way, when I read the post... I felt the same way, when I read the post…

]]> By: Section 40 http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/08/rookie-has-up-hill-battle/#comment-76887 Section 40 Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:48:41 +0000 http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=10671#comment-76887 I don't understand the "(and losing too)" written after brandon jennings in the story above. The bucks are 3-2. A few days ago, this blog wrote a whole story before the Indiana game which implied that we should be happy with a 2-3 record, which is ridiculous btw...why are you criticizing a rookie starting pg for being 3-2? It's a winning record. Can one of the writers on this blog explain that? It's getting harder and harder to read this blog as it gets more slanted toward the knicks. Let's be fair people, come on... I don’t understand the “(and losing too)” written after brandon jennings in the story above. The bucks are 3-2.

A few days ago, this blog wrote a whole story before the Indiana game which implied that we should be happy with a 2-3 record, which is ridiculous btw…why are you criticizing a rookie starting pg for being 3-2? It’s a winning record.

Can one of the writers on this blog explain that? It’s getting harder and harder to read this blog as it gets more slanted toward the knicks. Let’s be fair people, come on…

]]> By: Its The Kid http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/08/rookie-has-up-hill-battle/#comment-76886 Its The Kid Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:46:41 +0000 http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=10671#comment-76886 Its very clear, either you get it or you dont... Its very clear, either you get it or you dont…

]]> By: itzyung1 http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/08/rookie-has-up-hill-battle/#comment-76881 itzyung1 Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:33:02 +0000 http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=10671#comment-76881 dude what the hell are you talking about. dude what the hell are you talking about.

]]> By: Its The Kid http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/08/rookie-has-up-hill-battle/#comment-76880 Its The Kid Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:18:28 +0000 http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=10671#comment-76880 When you read stuff like this, you need to put what is being said into perspective... 1st off, Jordan Hill was a Junior in College on a team that underachieved, every year... Brandon Jennings would've been a Freshmen... So Hill has 2years of high-level development on Jennings... This is not the Channing Frye and Bynum scenario... Unless Hill is Frye and Jennings is Bynum... And if thats the case, judging by how Jennings is already playing, passing on him was really a mistake... By the way, Frye was a FA who signed we Phx for 2mil... He was perfect for MD's system, you pick a pg and pay Frye 2mil we are way better... But I digress... 2nd Ty Lawson was the "straw that stirs the drink" on a championship team... A proven winner, from a winning program and we passed on him... He was also the best pure point in the draft, by far... Keep in mind that we havent had a winning culture here since the early 2000... So couldnt we have used Lawson more than Hill? 3rd On draft night we traded for Darko, so did we really need Hill... Can you develop both at the same time? I can go on, but why beat you in the head... You know where all this is going... When you read stuff like this, you need to put what is being said into perspective…

1st off, Jordan Hill was a Junior in College on a team that underachieved, every year… Brandon Jennings would’ve been a Freshmen… So Hill has 2years of high-level development on Jennings… This is not the Channing Frye and Bynum scenario… Unless Hill is Frye and Jennings is Bynum… And if thats the case, judging by how Jennings is already playing, passing on him was really a mistake… By the way, Frye was a FA who signed we Phx for 2mil… He was perfect for MD’s system, you pick a pg and pay Frye 2mil we are way better… But I digress…

2nd Ty Lawson was the “straw that stirs the drink” on a championship team… A proven winner, from a winning program and we passed on him… He was also the best pure point in the draft, by far… Keep in mind that we havent had a winning culture here since the early 2000… So couldnt we have used Lawson more than Hill?

3rd On draft night we traded for Darko, so did we really need Hill… Can you develop both at the same time? I can go on, but why beat you in the head… You know where all this is going…

]]>