Guarding the Pick and Roll
Great piece in the NY Times by the talented Jonathan Abrams. He breaks down the
pick and roll and even gets to the nitty gritty of the science of guarding one of the game’s oldest offensive sets.
“…The defender guarding the ball handler can squeeze past the player setting the pick to stay with the ball handler (known as going over the pick). He can also try to avoid the pick by running behind the pick and then resume guarding the ball handler once he moves past the screen (known as going under the pick).
The two defenders can also switch whom they are guarding, with the taller defender momentarily defending the smaller ball handler and trying to hinder his vision before hurrying back to the player who set the pick. Or the defender guarding the ball handler can try to direct him away from the pick before it can take place.
The strategy varies team to team, night to night. The Synergy analysis showed that defenses were most effective when the on-ball defender went under the pick, temporarily abandoning the ball handler and then picking him up again. For example, when the defender went under the pick against James, he averaged 0.93 points. When James was played over the pick, he averaged 1.02 points.
Yet a majority of teams played over the pick. They defended that way, Barr said, to show defensive aggressiveness instead of passiveness, even if it hurt them in the long run…”
This, of course, was not the case last year for the Knicks. Chris Duhon, early in the year, got “over screens” while the other guards did not. In a small sample size, the scoring differential I recorded resulted in a much lower scoring rate when the guard got “over” the screen that led to a trail.
The Knicks switch on their screens, because they feel they have the length to guard multiple positions. Obviously Chris Duhon or Nate Robinson do not.
I’m not sold on The Synergy analysis because consistently getting under screens leads to open jump shots. You can get under a screen against, say Tony Parker, who has made defenders pay recently because he became a better jump shooter. Same with Rondo.
While I feel that not signing Iverson means there are other opportunities for deals, maybe the team felt that whatever Iverson gave them offensively, he wouldn’t help them in their biggest need: Defense.
-
DeBusscherescorner
-
joetheknick
-
oscar f
-
Adam L
-
Earl The Pearl




