<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recap Celts 107 Knicks 105</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/22/recap-knicks-107-celtics-105/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/22/recap-knicks-107-celtics-105/</link>
	<description>The One-Stop Shop for Hopeful Knick Fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:38:03 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NoVaCaInE</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/22/recap-knicks-107-celtics-105/comment-page-1/#comment-81315</link>
		<dc:creator>NoVaCaInE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=11017#comment-81315</guid>
		<description>Great stuff! To many fans No D Lee can do no wrong. I sincerely hope Eddy Curry can turn his career around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff! To many fans No D Lee can do no wrong. I sincerely hope Eddy Curry can turn his career around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mucha</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/22/recap-knicks-107-celtics-105/comment-page-1/#comment-81314</link>
		<dc:creator>Mucha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=11017#comment-81314</guid>
		<description>Mike D&#039;Antoni reportedly knew that he had a foul to give...

It&#039;s on David Lee and Wilson Chandler.

My bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike D&#8217;Antoni reportedly knew that he had a foul to give&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s on David Lee and Wilson Chandler.</p>
<p>My bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gbaked</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/22/recap-knicks-107-celtics-105/comment-page-1/#comment-81312</link>
		<dc:creator>gbaked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=11017#comment-81312</guid>
		<description>if any of you actually read the postgame recap, you would see this from david lee: “We had talked about waiting and stopping Pierce’s progress and we did that and didn’t think they would have time to throw back and still get a shot off. I am expecting Pierce to try and make a move and pull up. Good play by them and it is just unfortunate to lose a game like this. &lt;b&gt;We knew we had a foul to give and we didn’t get one.&lt;/b&gt;”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if any of you actually read the postgame recap, you would see this from david lee: “We had talked about waiting and stopping Pierce’s progress and we did that and didn’t think they would have time to throw back and still get a shot off. I am expecting Pierce to try and make a move and pull up. Good play by them and it is just unfortunate to lose a game like this. <b>We knew we had a foul to give and we didn’t get one.</b>”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gbaked</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/22/recap-knicks-107-celtics-105/comment-page-1/#comment-81311</link>
		<dc:creator>gbaked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=11017#comment-81311</guid>
		<description>i think many of you underestimate Duhon. I am not saying he is great, or even that good... but TD is NOT ready to run the offense (hopefully by seasons end he is) and nate is NOT a pg. Getting on MD for playing him is fruitless because he has no other options. 

And I still am not upset about passing on sessions... 

Also - if any of you actually read the postgame recap, you would see this from david lee: &quot;We had talked about waiting and stopping Pierce&#039;s progress and we did that and didn&#039;t think they would have time to throw back and still get a shot off. I am expecting Pierce to try and make a move and pull up. Good play by them and it is just unfortunate to lose a game like this. &lt;b&gt;We knew we had a foul to give and we didn&#039;t get one.&lt;/b&gt;&quot;

so maybe it was the players and not the coach? hmm... or maybe you all like to complain too much? hmm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think many of you underestimate Duhon. I am not saying he is great, or even that good&#8230; but TD is NOT ready to run the offense (hopefully by seasons end he is) and nate is NOT a pg. Getting on MD for playing him is fruitless because he has no other options. </p>
<p>And I still am not upset about passing on sessions&#8230; </p>
<p>Also &#8211; if any of you actually read the postgame recap, you would see this from david lee: &#8220;We had talked about waiting and stopping Pierce&#8217;s progress and we did that and didn&#8217;t think they would have time to throw back and still get a shot off. I am expecting Pierce to try and make a move and pull up. Good play by them and it is just unfortunate to lose a game like this. <b>We knew we had a foul to give and we didn&#8217;t get one.</b>&#8221;</p>
<p>so maybe it was the players and not the coach? hmm&#8230; or maybe you all like to complain too much? hmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoVaCaInE</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/22/recap-knicks-107-celtics-105/comment-page-1/#comment-81310</link>
		<dc:creator>NoVaCaInE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=11017#comment-81310</guid>
		<description>It always amazes me how many of the posters continue to spell EDDY CURRY&#039;S name wrong. It was a great game. Knicks competed through out. I have an issue however with D&#039;Antoni&#039;s rotation down the stretch. Why was Nate on the bench in favor of Duhon when he provides another offensive threat? Why the hell was NO D Lee in the game when there is a better defensive option on the bench for that final play? I don&#039;t get how the coach does not emphasize during the time out to use the foul so that Boston has to reset their play with less time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It always amazes me how many of the posters continue to spell EDDY CURRY&#8217;S name wrong. It was a great game. Knicks competed through out. I have an issue however with D&#8217;Antoni&#8217;s rotation down the stretch. Why was Nate on the bench in favor of Duhon when he provides another offensive threat? Why the hell was NO D Lee in the game when there is a better defensive option on the bench for that final play? I don&#8217;t get how the coach does not emphasize during the time out to use the foul so that Boston has to reset their play with less time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NashWonder</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/22/recap-knicks-107-celtics-105/comment-page-1/#comment-81305</link>
		<dc:creator>NashWonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=11017#comment-81305</guid>
		<description>I agree. Nate was playing well enough to warrant playing in the last moments of the game. Rondo guarding Duhon the Knicks were playing 4 on 5 cuz Duhon is doing nothing in that matchup. I like Curry&#039;s passion, the flagrant didn&#039;t bother me (Especially since it was on Rondo who I am not a fan of). He was also up cheering when he wasn&#039;t in the game. The foul to give was a big problem but hey it could&#039;ve been worse. We could&#039;ve got blown out and gave 0% of effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Nate was playing well enough to warrant playing in the last moments of the game. Rondo guarding Duhon the Knicks were playing 4 on 5 cuz Duhon is doing nothing in that matchup. I like Curry&#8217;s passion, the flagrant didn&#8217;t bother me (Especially since it was on Rondo who I am not a fan of). He was also up cheering when he wasn&#8217;t in the game. The foul to give was a big problem but hey it could&#8217;ve been worse. We could&#8217;ve got blown out and gave 0% of effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ds2488</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/22/recap-knicks-107-celtics-105/comment-page-1/#comment-81268</link>
		<dc:creator>ds2488</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=11017#comment-81268</guid>
		<description>I definitely agree jeff.  there is no reason that Duhon should still be playing and it shows the stubborness of Dantoni.  However in his defense, he played pretty good d on Ray allen, fighting over screens a bunch of time to get to him.  Robinson and Doug both had some problems with him and house when they were in, and I think Dantoni liked the matchup with Hughes on Rondo.  Thats still no excuse for his atrocious offensive play, and the fact of the matter is he makes nobody even remotely better on this team and kills their pick and roll offense and entire fastbreak.  Definitely should entrust the offense to either Doug or Robinson, or maybe both at this point with the inconsistent play of Hughes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely agree jeff.  there is no reason that Duhon should still be playing and it shows the stubborness of Dantoni.  However in his defense, he played pretty good d on Ray allen, fighting over screens a bunch of time to get to him.  Robinson and Doug both had some problems with him and house when they were in, and I think Dantoni liked the matchup with Hughes on Rondo.  Thats still no excuse for his atrocious offensive play, and the fact of the matter is he makes nobody even remotely better on this team and kills their pick and roll offense and entire fastbreak.  Definitely should entrust the offense to either Doug or Robinson, or maybe both at this point with the inconsistent play of Hughes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Cykiert</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/22/recap-knicks-107-celtics-105/comment-page-1/#comment-81265</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Cykiert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=11017#comment-81265</guid>
		<description>Tough loss... I was at the game; the energy in the garden went from nothing to amazing, and it peaked when Eddy curry got the technical. 

Couple things worth pointing out: It kind of bothers me how much is in the hands of the refs. They proved in the closing minutes that they can completely dictate the outcome. They saw they missed the trip on the megatron so they call a bullshit offensive foul on ray allen to make up for it. That is not the proper way to officiate a sport; its too subjective.

There were long stretches where there was automatically a foul on both sides of the floor every time down the floor; foul shots on both sides every possession... that is not fun to watch.

The other major point i want to make is one that has been thrown around a lot lately; Duhon is absolute garbage. He cannot play with this team any more, it is enough. he can&#039;t get around anybody, when he does get into the lane he either dribbles back out or throws a bad pass out for a bad three. He isn&#039;t good at defense. He has absolutely no way of scoring the basketball unless he is left completely wide open, which he often is and still fails to finish.

I know we don&#039;t have another true point guard on the roster; but i agree with the concept that we should just let nate run the point and either sink or swim. Duhon does not have to tools to help us win games; it&#039;s as simple as that. The season is young and it might be early to be calling d&#039;antoni stubborn. It is normal to give your once-guarenteed starters a chance to prove/re-prove themselves.... But sooner than later, the kid just needs to take a seat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tough loss&#8230; I was at the game; the energy in the garden went from nothing to amazing, and it peaked when Eddy curry got the technical. </p>
<p>Couple things worth pointing out: It kind of bothers me how much is in the hands of the refs. They proved in the closing minutes that they can completely dictate the outcome. They saw they missed the trip on the megatron so they call a bullshit offensive foul on ray allen to make up for it. That is not the proper way to officiate a sport; its too subjective.</p>
<p>There were long stretches where there was automatically a foul on both sides of the floor every time down the floor; foul shots on both sides every possession&#8230; that is not fun to watch.</p>
<p>The other major point i want to make is one that has been thrown around a lot lately; Duhon is absolute garbage. He cannot play with this team any more, it is enough. he can&#8217;t get around anybody, when he does get into the lane he either dribbles back out or throws a bad pass out for a bad three. He isn&#8217;t good at defense. He has absolutely no way of scoring the basketball unless he is left completely wide open, which he often is and still fails to finish.</p>
<p>I know we don&#8217;t have another true point guard on the roster; but i agree with the concept that we should just let nate run the point and either sink or swim. Duhon does not have to tools to help us win games; it&#8217;s as simple as that. The season is young and it might be early to be calling d&#8217;antoni stubborn. It is normal to give your once-guarenteed starters a chance to prove/re-prove themselves&#8230;. But sooner than later, the kid just needs to take a seat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: italian stallion</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/22/recap-knicks-107-celtics-105/comment-page-1/#comment-81264</link>
		<dc:creator>italian stallion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=11017#comment-81264</guid>
		<description>Yes I agree.

The flagrant foul would have been stupid if anyone else did it, but coming from Curry it was a great sign. One of his biggest problems has been a lack of passion, but he&#039;s playing very passionately right now. He&#039;s not taking shit from anyone down there and personally I like it .   I&#039;d like to see some bodies flying once in awhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I agree.</p>
<p>The flagrant foul would have been stupid if anyone else did it, but coming from Curry it was a great sign. One of his biggest problems has been a lack of passion, but he&#8217;s playing very passionately right now. He&#8217;s not taking shit from anyone down there and personally I like it .   I&#8217;d like to see some bodies flying once in awhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: italian stallion</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2009/11/22/recap-knicks-107-celtics-105/comment-page-1/#comment-81263</link>
		<dc:creator>italian stallion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=11017#comment-81263</guid>
		<description>I agree. 

Curry is not a great player, but he&#039;s a big body, draws a lot of fouls and is a very efficient inside scorer when he&#039;s at his best.  He hasn&#039;t played in so long it&#039;s pretty ridiculous to expect him to walk on the court and be 100%. We have to give him a few weeks at least. 

I can be really critical of players and point out their weaknesses, but some Knicks fans are just too much. They hate certain players (like Curry). No matter what they do they find the bad.  On the flip side they love other players and overlook all the flaws. 

There isn&#039;t a single good all around player on the Knicks. 

I love Gallo as a prospect, but right now he can&#039;t play defense, is as slow footed as they come, is a poor rebounder for a man his size, is not exactly accumulating assists (and didn&#039;t in Europe either), and occasionally shows a lack of hustle.  In fact, all he has shown so far is that he&#039;s an excellent shooter and efficient scorer. Yet somehow he is totally immune to criticism.  I don&#039;t get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. </p>
<p>Curry is not a great player, but he&#8217;s a big body, draws a lot of fouls and is a very efficient inside scorer when he&#8217;s at his best.  He hasn&#8217;t played in so long it&#8217;s pretty ridiculous to expect him to walk on the court and be 100%. We have to give him a few weeks at least. </p>
<p>I can be really critical of players and point out their weaknesses, but some Knicks fans are just too much. They hate certain players (like Curry). No matter what they do they find the bad.  On the flip side they love other players and overlook all the flaws. </p>
<p>There isn&#8217;t a single good all around player on the Knicks. </p>
<p>I love Gallo as a prospect, but right now he can&#8217;t play defense, is as slow footed as they come, is a poor rebounder for a man his size, is not exactly accumulating assists (and didn&#8217;t in Europe either), and occasionally shows a lack of hustle.  In fact, all he has shown so far is that he&#8217;s an excellent shooter and efficient scorer. Yet somehow he is totally immune to criticism.  I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.075 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-15 02:42:19 -->
