1 0 Archive | February, 2010
post icon

In Case You Missed It…

By Chris Alvino on Feb 28, 2010, 10:51 pm

Click here in case you missed Anthony’s big show tonight.  First, Rice Balls had a chance to chat with Grizzlies’ forward, Zach Randolph.  Then, minutes later he had the chance to speak with the legendary coach of Syracuse, Mr. Jim Boeheim.  Fresh off Syracuse’s big win last night over Villanova, Coach Boeheim had plenty to talk about, including his current team and his former players now thriving in the NBA.   Also, listen to hear what Coach thinks his old Team USA star LeBron James will do once he hits the free agent market this summer.

There were a couple of interesting tidbits from the Randolph interview too.  First, Randolph still believes that the Knicks squad last season would have made the playoffs had Walsh decided to keep the roster in tact.  Also, Randolph talked about the negative reputation that followed him around earlier in his career.  Zach was clear that he has not necessarily changed, but rather that sometimes a reputation (whether true or not) sometimes follows you around.

Both were great interviews.  Check them out.

post icon

Reminder: Zach Randolph on With Anthony @ 9

By Chris Alvino on Feb 28, 2010, 8:26 pm

Remember to check out TKB Radio with Anthony Rice Balls flying solo tonight @ 9.  His featured guest will be Zach Randolph.  For those of you who have been reading this site for a while, you may remember my gut reaction when Zach was dealt for nothing more than cap space.  While I understand the move now, I was not as sold when the move was made.  The bottom line is that Zach was an all-star caliber talent, and he was essentially given away. 

Zach had a bad rep when he came to NY, but most of those problems that he had in Portland did not seem to follow him to the Garden.  I never heard of him being in any sort of trouble in NYC.  In fact, I have read that he is in fact a great guy.

Now putting up a stellar season with the Grizz, it appears as though Randolph has found a home in Memphis.  That team looks to him for leadership on the court.  He is their best player and his ability to command attention has truly helped alleviate the pressures put on Gasol, Mayo, and Gay.

I am happy that he has grown as a player and he has received all-star recognition.  He deserves it.

Again, do not miss Anthony’s show tonight @ 9.  There is also the possibility of Rice Balls having a legendary guest on the show tonight.  That is yet to be determined.

post icon

TKB Radio Tonight @ 9

By Chris Alvino on Feb 28, 2010, 3:56 pm

Listen LIVE (click the player on the right on the BTR player)

Tune in to TKB Radio tonight at 9 PM to talk Knicks with Anthony “Rice Balls” Donahue. Listen to Anthony chat with former Knicks forward, Zach Randolph off the heels of a major game last night in his return to MSG.  I always liked Zach as a Knick and it is a shame that he had to be a part of the overhaul in NY.  Like Mike D’Antoni said, the move was necessary, but it was still a tough one to swallow.

Also, there may be another major guest coming on to chat.  All I can say is that this guest is an absolute legend.  More details to come as I hear of them.

Don’t miss tonight’s show, and as always, give a call in and let your voice be heard.

Call in to be a part of the show @:

(646) 478-5554

Become a fan of Anthony Rice Balls on his Facebook page @ http://www.facebook.com/TonyRiceBalls.

post icon

“I Play the Percentages”

By Tommy Dee on Feb 28, 2010, 10:00 am

Mike D’Antoni did some explaining last night in regards to whether or not to foul at the end of games when up by three points.

“…D’Antoni said he feels it’s not a given to foul with that much time left because the Knicks are a poor rebounding team. Against the Wizards, for instance, he said the fear is if McGee missed the second free throw, the Wizards could’ve grabbed the offensive rebound. The undersized Knicks, during their eight-game losing streak, were a minus-79 in rebounding, and allowed the Grizzlies to grab 17 offensive boards in last night’s 120-109 loss.

D’Antoni said he also is afraid the player about to be fouled could go into a quick shooting motion and be awarded three free throws.

“Conventional wisdom is to foul by everybody who has never coached a game,” D’Antoni said, taking a shot at his critics.

“Under five seconds, you always foul,” D’Antoni said. “Above five seconds, it gets dicey. You watch players, all you have to do is motion right there [to shoot]; he’s taking three [foul] shots. That’s a bad mistake. I play the percentages. The worst that happens is you control your own destiny and we had a shot at the end…”

The issue is more when the team has a foul to give, but the point is the same. When you’re an awful rebounding team, as the team has been the last two seasons, you can’t allow a team the opportunity to create points from the foul line. In other words, if you give the foul late you’re risking a shooting foul. But then the Knicks would at the very least get the ball back, assuming that the player would can all three free throws.

I’ve talked to 4 high-level coaches over the past two months and they’ve said it’s not an automatic given to foul. Those situations are taught in game film. A player moving forward against a certain number on the shot clock dictates and the message comes from the bench.

You’d be surprised at the team who would also play it “straight up” feeling they have that much confidence in their rebounding and defensive abilities. They don’t foul feeling the play represents weakness.

For D’Antoni, and many coaches, the percentage of hitting a three point shot under 5 seconds is very low. Unfortunately for the Knicks and Knick fans, it’s been 100% the last few times.

post icon

Game Highlights

By Tommy Dee on Feb 28, 2010, 9:36 am

Courtesy of Big C.

post icon

Game Thread: Grizzlies at Knicks

By Tommy Dee on Feb 27, 2010, 5:36 pm

On the heels of last night’s victory in DC the Knicks return home to face Zach Randolph’s Memphis Grizzlies.

The Grizz are also playing back-t0-back nights having lost to the Bobcats last night.

Memphis is just 4-8 in the month of February.

post icon

My Thoughts

By Tommy Dee on Feb 27, 2010, 11:00 am

My thoughts on the coach are pretty simple.

If you think you have the guy figured out based on this team, well, I just don’t believe you all too much.

As I’ve said all along, I will judge him starting with next year, and I actually respect the fact that he took this job.

As Coach Van Gundy told us the other night, leadership in the locker room is essential and that comes in the form of star players or players who have permission to lead from the star players.

A star player and leader changes every minute of every game, every plane or bus ride, every film session and every practice.

Everyone loves Marcus Camby. He may be the most talked about subject in terms of emails I’ve received. Van Gundy couldn’t stand the thought or sight of Camby after the Knicks traded Oakley for him. The coach made him earn every second he got and it payed off in the 99 playoffs. Camby was “alienated” from day one by the coach because of the loss of Oakley, only getting 20 minutes per game. That’s a former top 3 pick we’re talking about.

Again, forgive me if I’m not ready to anoint D’Antoni a failure.

Tom Coughlin couldn’t win here either.

To me, blaming the coach is far too convenient. Anything short of a championship is an “I told you so.”

Which I think is lame.

Can he win here? With the right players, absolutely. We’ll know more about that in the coming off season.

Are the Knicks on the Right Track with D'Antoni?


View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
post icon

The Other Side

By Tommy Dee on Feb 27, 2010, 9:45 am

By Kwame Eaddy

As always we ask that you send your submissions to theknicksblog@gmail.com

1. Mike D’Antoni can’t win against coaches with less coaching experience
2. Mike D’Antoni does not see that his players are not motivated by his alienation tactics,or doesn’t care

3. Here is a list of his true achievements as knick coach:

a. Worst start
b. most points scored in a half by an opponent
c. most points scored by a opposing player ( Kobe ) 61 pts
d. lowest amount of points in a game by the knicks ( due to his rotation )
e. allows 55+ points in the paint every game
f. soon to have 100 losses in two seasons topping all coaches in knick history
g. can not develop players to their potential ( Gallo, Lee,Chandler,Nate,Hill,Douglas)
How can I or any Knick fan defend his decisions, when the losses keep piling up and the players keep wanting out. Marc Berman wrote me and told me that he only alienates role players. But what he thinks is a role player is in fact a player that he needs to win. He comes on like a man with a sense of humor, but you quickly find out that he is a joke as a coach. He does not use his fouls to give to win games, he relies on shot attempts from a not ready NBA player. (Gallo) His idea of defense is Wilson Chandler and Jared Jefferies, David Lee and Gallo don’t have to lend a helping hand. No matter what, team defense and rebounding is the way the game is played. Gallo is no J.J. Hickson athletically or basketball IQ wise. So why in the world is he still standing in one spot waiting for the ball. Gallo does not move well without the ball, nor does he contain his man on defense. Mike’s system in Phoenix was about ball movement as well as players moving without the ball to create defensive laps to create the open shot. Steve Nash and company were very good at it, but we don’t have Steve Nash and I doubt there will ever be another Steve Nash. Mike D’Antoni must adapt to the game the way it is played now. Contending teams rule the way basketball is presently being played, not past losing teams and their almost won systems.
The Knicks must in order to compete play team defense, and rebound the ball as a team. Not let David Lee get the lions share of rebounds and remove him self from the responsibility to help on defense. The Knicks need Eddy Curry developed at the center position, he is one of the few legit big men left in the game . The paint must be protected not by violence, but by clogging the lane with a big body. All the teams contending this year for the championship have a legit big man, except Denver. The playoffs are a half court game, and a slow down pace on offense. When the game is slowed down that’s when defensive pressure can be put on the ball movement. I recall Phoenix and Dallas having the best records during the regular season, only to come up short in the playoffs, because of the way the game is played during them.
The Knicks need to spend their cap room obtaining draft picks, Then they need a coaching staff to develop them. I will call this my Eddy Curry rule. Players are drafted from High School and expected to be NBA ready. Lebron James is the only one I’ve seen do it successfully. All the others except Kobe who’s father played have continued to be less than ready. Eddy Curry can be taught defensive positioning and foot work defense. He can also be taught shot blocking techniques that he can be the presence in the post.
In summary I think the knicks were on the right path with Isaiah Thomas as far as building a team. Instead of not seeing that he has an eye for talent we choose to go after his former draft picks. ( Camby,T-Mac) etc. With that said the Knick organization should hire Isaiah Thomas back to fill the void left by Dick McGuire. Hire Tim Grover to be the conditioning coach and hire some one to develop our bigs.
post icon

Silence the Critics: Part 2

By Tommy Dee on Feb 27, 2010, 6:44 am

By Ryan Trapasso

As always, we encourage all you to express your thoughts. Send them to theknicksblog@gmail.com.

We are all evolving. Plants are evolving. Animals are evolving. Societies, governments, law, music, technology, and, yes, even sports are evolving. As bodies change, times change, and preferences change, sports have changed along with them. The advancements in technology making for better tires, engines, faster cars in NASCAR; easier to hit and longer clubs in golf, as well as more efficient ways to take care of courses; better knowledge of the human body to start training athletes more effectively at a younger age, especially in sports like football and basketball. As the passion for sports grows in our society, so, too, does the jump in participation and legitimacy of programs like AAU basketball and PAL football. I love having so many young people become involved in athletics and stepping away somewhat from the attraction to video games. So, where am I going with this? I’m saying that this evolution, from a basketball point of view, has itself an example of infancy in Coach D’Antoni.

Both praised and mocked as being an offensive innovator, Mike D’Antoni was known in Phoenix for a fast-paced, wide open style of basketball that scored a ton of points and produced some of the most exciting regular season basketball the league has seen. Night after night, you knew you were getting Steve Nash pushing the ball down your throat, a steady dose of pick-and-rolls, and a ton of threes. Steve Nash is Steve Nash, but what isn’t as widely noted is just how open the system gets players for those shots and how the Suns did play defense; it was just a different kind. The Suns were about hustle and athletic plays: steals, blocks, pushing off misses. Attack, attack, attack.

Yet, it’s not just Mike. The similarities in D’Antoni’s teams and the “new” NFL are staggering. Gone are the days of bruising, low-scoring affairs in football. The past three Super Bowls have seen the end of the old adage “run the ball, stop the run” in favor of “pass the ball, stop the pass.” It’s a quarterback’s league, now. It’s a star’s league. You attack, attack, attack. Sound familiar? You create turnovers more so than get stops, and you hope to have the ball last at the end to win the game. It’s not about building a lead and holding on to win, anymore. It’s offense. The amazing part, though, is fans are loving it. In 2009/2010, the NFL saw its best TV ratings in twenty years (the Saints/Colts matchup beat the record for viewers by M.A.S.H., for heaven’s sake), and with the league floating around more rule changes, such as the ban on the three-point stance, this new era of offense seems here to stay.

There are people who will say that you can’t win championships in sports without playing defense. My response to this is generally, “What kind of defense?” This coach’s system, defensively, thrives on athleticism and length; on turnovers you can capitalize on, much like the modern NFL. How did the Giants stop Tom Brady? Athletic plays made by their defensive line. How did Arizona come back against Pittsburgh, and how did Pittsburgh come back on them? An electric passing offense. How did the Saints have such a great season defensively and, also, pull out the win against Peyton Manning? Not bruising defense. Turnovers. How exciting were these games? Weren’t you on the edge of your seat like I was?

I understand that the NBA isn’t where the NFL is, yet, but I implore you to think about it. You do not need to play like you’re going to punish and throttle somebody carelessly who dares drive into the paint on you. There’s nothing wrong with playing hard, but step up and force them around or make a steal or a block. I don’t understand how using hard fouls and being the “bad guy” does anything beneficial for your team with how the rules are being called in games, now. You all see the touch fouls being called, so why not adapt and become more finesse; more crafty? Offense is starting to be favored in this league, so what’s wrong with trying to build a team around a system that takes advantage? Just because you’re a running team, that doesn’t mean you can’t play defense, too. It’s just not the defense most Knick fans seem used to. Wait until Coach D’Antoni has players that fit. Then, you can be the judge.

All that said, to me, there’s a more important point to be made, and this deals with the “softening” of all sports, not just basketball but certainly including it. In an increasingly concerned and cautious world, the safety of athletes of all ages has taken center stage. We’ve seen before how past generations loved smash-mouth sports. Hockey fans can surely cite bruising battles far better than I; football fans can surely look back and tell stories of trench battles, intense rivalries, brutal hits, and broken limbs. As we’ve approached the end of those generations, though, we’ve seen the result. Countless former pro athletes shells of themselves, not in an athletic sense, but in a functional, quality-of-life sense. We don’t see or hear enough the stories of the athletes who can’t function enough to take care of themselves because of the tens of concussions they suffered. We don’t see the man in the wheelchair who’s relearning how to write his own name. We don’t see the man who limps around on a cane in pain, wondering how he’s going to pay for a surgery he needs just to be able to keep walking in the limited way he does.

Too, the stories of a high school student left motionless on the field, everyone collectively holding their breath, praying he’s not paralyzed. Sometimes, he is. The young man or woman struck in the head in the batters’ box after a pitch gone awry. What about the kid who drives into the lane and is met with a hard foul? How many times has a young man or woman had their skull crash into a hardwood floor, experiencing a concussion that may rear its ugly head later on in their lives? What about a young girl taken down by a hard tackle on the soccer field, left with a broken leg? Not only can’t she play the game, but how much school will she miss? How much learning will she miss being out of school? Will it cost her a scholarship that was her only way of affording a higher education?

Obviously, there are risks playing sports, and we know this. We can’t prevent everything. I’m sure it’s true, too, that basketball is greatly less dangerous than football in the sense of spinal injuries and concussions, but that’s not to say it can’t or won’t happen. The sad thing is, though, the severity of injuries has the potential to get even worse. We have the technology and knowledge, now, to build such powerful bodies through proper nutrition and training, that the dangers are so very great. Can anyone argue against the positive aspects of the NFL banning players from “launching” themselves into another player, or the ban on helmet-to-helmet contact? What about NASCAR with the Dale Earnhardt tragedy and the introduction of required harnesses, and restrictor plates well before that? If we can limit injuries and still enjoy playing the sports we love, isn’t change worth it? There will always be people who want the “good ole days,” but I argue bring on the change. Bring on better training, athleticism, and a “softer” game for all sports. If it protects people and makes sports more exciting and fun for everyone involved, why not?

Fans like offense. With the explosion in popularity of fantasy sports, as well as the rise in ratings for sports lately (see: the ultimate case of “basketball on grass,” the 2010 Pro Bowl), this is something we know. Maybe it’s just me, but I can’t see that appetite for excitement diminishing, nor can I see a decrease in the need to better protect young people while still allowing them to play a game they love. This new wave, in many different sports, seems to be the real deal. I argue that it’s time the fans start to look at it from a different perspective and see how exciting the evolution of the sport we love could be. Now, basketball may not reach it as fast as football has, and, who knows, maybe, it never will, but I think we can adjust and enjoy ourselves even more than we ever imagined if it does.

post icon

Knicks 118 Wiz 116

By Tommy Dee on Feb 26, 2010, 10:39 pm

BOX SCORE

Via NBA.com

“…WASHINGTON(AP) David Lee‘s layup with 1.6 seconds to play in overtime gave the New York Knicks a 118-116 victory over the Washington Wizards on Friday night.

New York snapped an eight-game losing streak by surviving a bizarre overtime where the teams combined to miss 13 of their 16 field goal attempts.

With the game tied at 116, Lee – who had both of New York’s baskets in overtime – drove left and scored over JaVale McGee.

Lee, who had 25 points and 16 rebounds, hit a jumper with 3:12 remaining to give New York a 114-112 lead. McGee missed the second of two free throws with 13 seconds to play, and the Knicks’ lead was 114-113.

Al Harrington, who had 26 of his 37 points after halftime, hit two free throws with 12 seconds left to make it 116-113. Nick Young’s 3-pointer with 6.4 seconds remaining in overtime – Washington’s only basket in the extra five minutes – made it 116-all.

Washington missed seven of its eight field goal attempts in overtime.

The game was tied at 112 entering overtime after McGee blocked Wilson Chandler‘s layup attempt with 1.9 seconds remaining in regulation.

New York is 2-5 in overtime and Washington has lost all four of its overtime games.

Harrington has played fewer minutes in the four games since the arrival of Tracy McGrady, but he had his biggest game since the trade. McGrady had 23 points, but left with about 2 1/2 minutes remaining in the third quarter and did not return…”

post icon

Game Thread: Knicks at Wizards

By Tommy Dee on Feb 26, 2010, 7:24 pm

Not much to say, but play by play thoughts should go here…

post icon

Trending Topics…

By Tommy Dee on Feb 26, 2010, 4:20 pm

Check out Trending Topics where we talk about the Olympics amongst other “Trending Topics” on Twitter.

Follow Tommy on Twitter.

post icon

McGrady And Lee, Sittin’ In A Tree…

By Ben Kopelman on Feb 26, 2010, 10:11 am

…k-i-s-s-i-n-g?

Via Frank Isola:

“Tracy McGrady’s ringing endorsement of David Lee will serve Lee well during his big free agent summer.

“Lee could use McGrady’s quote as a recommendation with the resume: “I love playing with him,” T-Mac said of Lee. “He’s a very smart basketball player. He sets good screens. He knows when to set a good screen, he knows when to slip. He has great hands for a big guy. I really enjoy playing with him.”

Can you say: “ringing endorsement?”

I’m not sure how much TMac’s words will turn into dollars for David, but it surely can’t hurt Lee’s case.

It’s always good to be known as a good teamate and a smart player, but I am not sure how much clout McGrady has around the league these days for his comments to really have any effect…

post icon

McGrady Could Follow in LJ’s Footsteps

By Tommy Dee on Feb 26, 2010, 6:07 am

When Larry Johnson came to the Knicks in 1996, he was a shell of his former self. Gone were the days of Grandmama and the roars that followed thunderous dunks.Heck, I’m not even sure he had his infamous gold tooth when he finally appeared on Broadway.

We had a great chat with Jeff Van Gundy last night and we talked about Johnson, whom Van Gundy has always called “the greatest teammate he’s ever coached.”

To me, LJ may have have been the greatest and most dominant college player I’d ever seen. Seriously, Barkley 2.0.  Like Sir Charles, the word “tweener” never applied.  He was faster than you and stronger than you.  And also like Chuck, he had to learn to be an all-around player once his nagging back injury limited him as his NBA career wore on. But LJ proved in college he could blend in with teammates and put ego aside and that went with him, and allowed him to flourish in the league.

He had a well publicized rift in Charlotte with Alonzo Mourning, but  LJ put aside his ego for the betterment of his team in New York and that earned him a ton of respect from his coach and the fans.

Plenty of stars, and yes LJ was a star, can’t do that. They can’t put ego aside and help defend. Or sit in the gym and polish post moves, or a shooting stroke hour after hour.

LJ did.

Tracy McGrady is in a similar position and his career is at the crossroads. Can he be relevant and show flashes, and defer most nights? Can he defend at a playoff level and make open 3s?

Can he be a star who learned to reinvent himself and have the respect that LJ did in this town?

We’ll have to see, but if he can this is the place to do it and be remembered for it.

post icon

Eric Snow Book Signing in NYC

By Tommy Dee on Feb 25, 2010, 10:04 pm

Thanks again to Eric Snow of NBA.tv for coming on TKB Radio and here’s the information for his upcoming appearances in NYC.

“…On March 2nd Eric is doing a book signing at the NBA Store on 5th Avenue
(btwn 52nd & 53rd)in NYC from 1pm-2pm.

Later that night (7pm-9pm), he is at the Lincoln Center’s Avery Hall at the
Lincoln Center Plaza where he appears on a panel with Hip Hop Star, Common,
Grammy Award Winning Artist John Legend, and others as part of a Men of
Color discussion sponsored by Teach For America…”