<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Around the Net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theknicksblog.com/2010/02/08/around-the-net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2010/02/08/around-the-net/</link>
	<description>The One-Stop Shop for Hopeful Knick Fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:30:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lowest price for phentermine.</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2010/02/08/around-the-net/#comment-125334</link>
		<dc:creator>Lowest price for phentermine.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=12496#comment-125334</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Phentermine....&lt;/strong&gt;

Phentermine....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Phentermine&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Phentermine&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobbyFromBK</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2010/02/08/around-the-net/#comment-103153</link>
		<dc:creator>BobbyFromBK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=12496#comment-103153</guid>
		<description>From Howard Beck in today&#039;s Times: 

...&quot;There are also signs of resentment in the locker room over David Lee’s newfound stardom. Lee is having a breakout season (19.9 points and 11.5 rebounds) and was the Knicks’ top candidate to make the All-Star team. Some players believe that D’Antoni has featured Lee at their expense...&quot;


This should let everyone know what&#039;s up with D&#039;antoni&#039;s N.Y. Bricks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Howard Beck in today&#8217;s Times: </p>
<p>&#8230;&#8221;There are also signs of resentment in the locker room over David Lee’s newfound stardom. Lee is having a breakout season (19.9 points and 11.5 rebounds) and was the Knicks’ top candidate to make the All-Star team. Some players believe that D’Antoni has featured Lee at their expense&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>This should let everyone know what&#8217;s up with D&#8217;antoni&#8217;s N.Y. Bricks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knicks4life</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2010/02/08/around-the-net/#comment-103149</link>
		<dc:creator>Knicks4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=12496#comment-103149</guid>
		<description>And the Knicks in one form or another passed on all of Portland&#039;s PGs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the Knicks in one form or another passed on all of Portland&#8217;s PGs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob go knicks</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2010/02/08/around-the-net/#comment-103144</link>
		<dc:creator>bob go knicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=12496#comment-103144</guid>
		<description>man!how can portland have 5 pgs and the KNICKS have  one in two years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man!how can portland have 5 pgs and the KNICKS have  one in two years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DVJ</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2010/02/08/around-the-net/#comment-103133</link>
		<dc:creator>DVJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=12496#comment-103133</guid>
		<description>Blackberrys can&#039;t get no love?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blackberrys can&#8217;t get no love?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BiggieSmalls</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2010/02/08/around-the-net/#comment-103132</link>
		<dc:creator>BiggieSmalls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=12496#comment-103132</guid>
		<description>SerIously...at this point who WOULdNT anyone take over duhon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SerIously&#8230;at this point who WOULdNT anyone take over duhon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HaS</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2010/02/08/around-the-net/#comment-103129</link>
		<dc:creator>HaS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=12496#comment-103129</guid>
		<description>Hardly a &quot;must buy&quot;.

No shots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hardly a &#8220;must buy&#8221;.</p>
<p>No shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barnaby8787</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2010/02/08/around-the-net/#comment-103125</link>
		<dc:creator>barnaby8787</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=12496#comment-103125</guid>
		<description>I would take blake over duhon though.  At least he knows (somewhat) what it means to be a point guard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would take blake over duhon though.  At least he knows (somewhat) what it means to be a point guard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mucha</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2010/02/08/around-the-net/#comment-103123</link>
		<dc:creator>Mucha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=12496#comment-103123</guid>
		<description>Blake sucks.

Bayless is a baller, he&#039;ll be a very good player in a couple of years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blake sucks.</p>
<p>Bayless is a baller, he&#8217;ll be a very good player in a couple of years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barnaby8787</title>
		<link>http://www.theknicksblog.com/2010/02/08/around-the-net/#comment-103120</link>
		<dc:creator>barnaby8787</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theknicksblog.com/?p=12496#comment-103120</guid>
		<description>btw, http://www.beyondthebeat.net/20100208404/2010-articles/february/blake-a-point-of-no-return.html   On the bottom it discusses how hahn said to &quot;add the knicks to the list&quot; in regards to teams interested in blake.  So many possibilities in regards to trades considering they have a need for both lee and harrington (they would prob go for lee over harrington though) and we have a need for a point (blake, maybe bayless) and we would love rudy obviously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw, <a href="http://www.beyondthebeat.net/20100208404/2010-articles/february/blake-a-point-of-no-return.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.beyondthebeat.net/20100208404/2010-articles/february/blake-a-point-of-no-return.html</a>   On the bottom it discusses how hahn said to &#8220;add the knicks to the list&#8221; in regards to teams interested in blake.  So many possibilities in regards to trades considering they have a need for both lee and harrington (they would prob go for lee over harrington though) and we have a need for a point (blake, maybe bayless) and we would love rudy obviously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 2/5 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 291/292 objects using memcached

Served from: www.theknicksblog.com @ 2012-02-10 23:35:53 -->
