Is Carmelo’s Playoff Reputation Unwarranted?
In reading this column from ESPN this morning, I’ve come to the following realization. 
What does Melo has to “earn his money” really mean? Isn’t that a bit cliche? Two wins? Seven games? What is the value attached to his paycheck? I’m not trying to sound naive I just think that Melo has always been in a tough spot. He has the talent at this point to win series, but he’s only had one year of real success in the department. Some of that wasn’t his fault. If his numbers are great, he must not make teammates better. If they aren’t great, he’s played terrible.
The fact is, to me, Carmelo’s playoff reputation to this point is overblown in my opinion.
In Melo’s 7 playoff appearances he’s faced 2 eventual NBA champions (Spurs) , one team that went to the Finals (Lakers) and one that went to the Conference Finals and lost to the NBA champions (Minnesota)…in the first round. The one year the Nuggets won series’ they would lose to the eventual NBA Champions in 6 hard-fought games. And when he leads his team to 54 games he has to play the first round without his head coach.
Consider the obvious idea that if his Nuggets played in the East there’s a good chance he gets out of the first round more often and possibly makes more than one Conference Final with Chauncey Billups. Speculative, yes, but the East simply wasn’t as good then as it is now.
In Melo’s very first year with Denver they made the playoffs. Oh, and they happened to improve by 26 games. They lost to Kevin Garnett and the Timberwolves, who would only make a run to the Conference Finals before losing to Kobe and the Lakers. The Nuggets had Camby, Nene and Andre Miller, but they started an aging Voshon Lenard. And, believe it or not, not even the great Jon Barry could help them advance in the playoffs helping off the bench. Like most rookies, Melo was pretty brutal that series, shooting just 32% and averaging almost 5 turnovers and 15 points in 4 games.
The next season George Karl would bring his playoff experience to Mile High and Kenyon Martin and his astronomical contract would join the party as well. The Nuggets paid more attention to defensive detail and surge to a 32-8 final 40 games only to lose to, ahem, the eventual NBA champion Spurs (at the peak of their game) in 5 games. Melo would fair a little better in that series netting 19 points and 42% from the field against the best defensive team in the league and probably of the decade.
In an injury-plagued season for the Nuggets, Denver would make the playoffs behind 44 wins, but lose to the LA Clippers who would take the Phoenix Suns to 7 games in the Conference semis. Camby and Martin spent 30 something games each out of the lineup while Melo and Miller tried to hold things together. Melo was again somewhat underwhelming individually in the series getting just 21 points, 5 points less than his average, while also finishing below his seasons’ averages is field goal and FT percentages.
In 2006-07, the Nuggets did well to finish 2nd in their division and that earned them another shot at the eventually champion Spurs. During the season the Nuggets would acquire Allen Iverson and, while they had their good moments, it was obvious this was a mix that wasn’t going to bring positive results. Melo needed a player to look to get him the ball in positions where he was a threat, not have Melo play off of his creativity. That’s basically why Iverson wasn’t the Answer to the Nuggets playoff issues. And, well, the Spurs defense. That said, Melo would have his most productive and efficient series to date, but it wasn’t enough to earn them more than a single victory against San Antonio and in the following year the combination of Iverson and Melo would implode as they were swept by the Conference champion LA Lakers in 4 games.
When Chauncey Billups arrived so did Melo’s ability to thrive in key moments. He would set career highs in PER, PPG and most other statistical categories making it to the conference finals for the first time. They would lose to the eventual NBA Champion Lakers in 6 games, but it was a strong run and something to build on. That success would be short lived despite earning the 4th position as Melo and the Nuggets would lose to Deron Williams and the Jazz in 6 games in the first round. If you watched that series, Melo was fantastic, but the Jazz were too good up front and Williams was the best player on the floor in the series. It also didn’t help that George Karl was on the mend as Adrian Dantley had little clue on the Nuggets sidelines in terms of making adjustments and sub patterns. AD is a great basketball mind and former player and it’s hard to get on him too much for the lack of experience in that situation.
There is no question Melo has a lot to prove. And believe me, no one will care about the shots in Memphis or Indiana if he doesn’t make them against Boston. People who write about baseball and absolutely hate the Yankees gleefully called out A-Rod for his lack of “clutch” play. Fans ultimately did too. Penning an article about an unproven playoff player who makes big money is as cliche and cookie cutter as saying a hot goalie can win you a Stanley Cup or that pitching wins World Series’.
Again, in Melo’s 7 playoff appearances he’s faced 3 eventual NBA champions, one team that went to the Finals and one that went to the Conference Finals and lost to the NBA champions. He won over 50 games in 3 straight years in the Western Conference where teams over .500 routinely don’t get invited.
But the numbers are what they are and there are questions. Questions that Melo will have to face x 100 now that he’s in New York. Because the big bad media demands greatness. I think Melo is ready to show the world that he can perform and win, but this isn’t the type of series that he can win by himself. The Knicks aren’t built that way just yet.
But one bad series and the questions will truly mount.
Welcome to the postseason in New York.
Sources: ESPN-NY
Basketball-reference.com
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_CNWZGJGLDEYT5T2LV33D7TYN4A Douglas
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_UFNUQHPO6XBPWDY6YBZ2ZKQ44M Tom
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DEQCJTK3ZAEBNZES6SG542CCIE Phil
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DEQCJTK3ZAEBNZES6SG542CCIE Phil
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_UFNUQHPO6XBPWDY6YBZ2ZKQ44M Tom
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_UFNUQHPO6XBPWDY6YBZ2ZKQ44M Tom
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IRBXKEIXVMOUMM7CTZYDYIOCBQ speedster
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IRBXKEIXVMOUMM7CTZYDYIOCBQ speedster
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
http://twitter.com/FreestyleDaily Matt Ish
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_K2GJP6JV6II7ERBYC6G7PVQJPA Witold Mucha
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_K2GJP6JV6II7ERBYC6G7PVQJPA Witold Mucha
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_K2GJP6JV6II7ERBYC6G7PVQJPA Witold Mucha
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3RGKXYRB3RFODDMZLHZFE7JGFE NAC
-
Anonymous
-
http://twitter.com/JerseyNaijaBoy Chibu Ibida
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_K2GJP6JV6II7ERBYC6G7PVQJPA Witold Mucha
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_CNWZGJGLDEYT5T2LV33D7TYN4A Douglas
-
Anonymous
-
Guest
-
Guest
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_P4LIWY7PKZPEAMBLUH2DF2IUIU True
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_P4LIWY7PKZPEAMBLUH2DF2IUIU True
-
Guest
-
Guest
-
Guest
-
Guest
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SRI47O3JZLDIAK53VOPVCOQCCM Randy Watson
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SRI47O3JZLDIAK53VOPVCOQCCM Randy Watson
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_K2GJP6JV6II7ERBYC6G7PVQJPA Witold Mucha
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_K2GJP6JV6II7ERBYC6G7PVQJPA Witold Mucha
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Guest
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Guest
-
Guest
-
Anonymous





