“…”Curry,” Walsh answered when asked whether he would have taken Stephen Curry or Ricky Rubio. “Not only is he a great shooter but he can get his shot on anyone. Opponents look at his baby face and figure they can manhandle him. Meanwhile he tore up every top-rated guard he went up against at our workout, including Tyreke Evans, who might be the best player in the draft next to Blake Griffin…”

Interesting that Curry would be the pick over Rubio in my opinion based on the fact that Rubio seems to fit D’Antoni’s style a little better. Granted, I liked Curry as a facilitator and shot maker given space, but I thought Walsh for sure was targeting Rubio and heard several things of the like.

That being said, Walsh didn’t aggressively move in on Curry or move up one spot to take him at #7, which makes me wonder just how much in love they were with him. And judging from what’s coming out of Golden State, Curry isn’t a great fit with teammate Monta Ellis.

• Via the Minnesota Star Tribune is reporting that the Knicks did offer Chandler and 8 to move up for Rubio and the Wolves declined. Why on earth would the Wolves would decline, I have no idea. They also noted that the Knicks had Rubio on top of their list ahead of Curry, which we figured all along.

“… The Wolves did turn down that Knicks’ offer of No. 8 and Wilson Chandler for the No. 5, which Donnie Walsh would have used to take Rubio and not Stephen Curry…”

• Mitch Lawrence is reporting the Rockets made an offer for Rubio.

“…Mitch Lawrence of the New York Daily News reported that the Wolves turned down a deal with the Houston Rockets that would have resulted in Aaron Brooks and Shane Battier headed to Minnesota for Ricky Rubio…”

“…So a predictable scenario was playing out, one that eerily followed Rubio’s comments Wednesday about needing to be taken in a “top spot” to make the approximately $4 million buyout with his European team, JKV Joventut, palatable. Not inclined to view Minnesota — and the $5.7 million rookie-scale guarantee over the first two years — as a “top spot,” Rubio apparently would rather go home for a year or two than play for the T-Wolves.

“Now I know where I’m going to go, so I have to talk with the team, what exactly they want about me, and if necessary, I’m going to pay the buyout,” Rubio said.

That’s fine with David Kahn, Minnesota’s new GM, who had the stones to pick Rubio even though he knew it would be problematic. He knew it would be problematic because Rubio was represented by Dan Fegan, who tried to scare the bejesus out of the Milwaukee Bucks when they dared to select Yi Jianlian in 2007. That didn’t end well, depending on your perspective. Yi was dealt to the Nets in a package for Richard Jefferson, who was given away to San Antonio this week for expiring contracts.

But I digress. Back to Esteban, whose quotes only get better, according to the expert translation service I employed for much less than the $24 “Knicks draft caps” they were selling at the Garden. (No Frederic Weis jerseys, though.)

“It is probable that we will remain in Europe one or two years,” Rubio’s father said. “Everything is open, although the most probable is to continue in Europe for some time. We have to talk with the people in Minnesota … and we will see what will happen. Because at this hour, we could be in Minnesota or we could be somewhere else.”

That was the handiwork of Fegan, who was trying to broker a deal sending Rubio to the Knicks. No such luck. Knicks coach Mike D’Antoni was plenty happy with Jordan Hill at No. 8. Kahn, according to a rival executive, believed that Rubio was by far the best point guard in this draft. He likes Rubio so much, in fact, that he’s apparently willing to wait out his return to Europe rather than trade him.
“He might be right,” another rival exec said…”

My guy always told me that Rubio was target one and as much as I’d like to think that Walsh can work this out, I’m not all that confident. It’s why the Wolves took Flynn and it’s why they didn’t allow the Knicks 28 (and take UNC’s Wayne Ellington? How’s that for adding insult to injury?) That being the case, then why would the Wolves  allow the Knicks Rubio?

Allowing Rubio to head back to Europe is straight idiotic. They gave up their backcourt to pick 2 point guards and then let one walk? Maybe they are waiting for the best offer. But you’d have to believe that if a deal were to get done, it would have been done by now. That said there can always be a third team involved, so all hope is not lost.

• Sounds like possible destinations for David Lee could be Portland or Memphis, yes Memphis. We told you Portland had interest around the deadline, then heard recently they are focusing on Turkoglu, but a source tells me that if the Knicks don’t get close to what his agent deems as max value, expect a sign and trade to either. Chicago could have been a possibility, but there are way too many moving parts. Chicago doesn’t want to give up what the Knicks would want, and remember Ben Gordon is unrestricted.

• The Knicks aren’t the only team in the area who have serious interest in Gerald Henderson. Kudos to Isola for digging to hear that Henderson is a possibility in NY, which I’ve heard two other people mention, and one who I really trust. You guys have heard Rubio and Jrue out of me…but you know I would have drafted Henderson in March.

• The Nets have high interest in the Duke product and right now they rank him and Terence Williams about even. You can throw Tyler Hansbrough into the discussion as well. They will take Demar DeRozan if he falls but not before Jordan Hill if he falls. They are not targeting Brandon Jennings (neither are the Knicks despite reports), DeJuan Blair or James Johnson.

• Speaking of Johnson, Golden State is all over him. Obviously, 7 is too early for the Wake product, but they are trying every means necessary to try and obtain another pick to get him. They think he’s a steal.

Also, Via Chris Broussard (12:45am)

“…The Cleveland Cavaliers and the Phoenix Suns have come to an agreement on a blockbuster trade that sends Shaquille O’Neal to Cleveland to team with LeBron James, according to sources.

The deal has been agreed to in principle and is expected to be finalized Thursday, according to sources.

Cleveland will send Ben Wallace and Sasha Pavlovic to Phoenix for the future Hall of Famer.

The trade gives the Cavs a player they’ve coveted since February. With center Zydrunas Ilgauskas starting to break down, adding Shaq to the roster gives them a dominant force in the middle. The Cavs were obviously unhappy with their ability to defend Dwight Howard in the playoffs and bringing Shaq into the fold should help.

I’m also told that Chris Kaman and Tyson Chandler are being shopped and could have new homes tomorrow…”

Could we add another Chandler? Can’t wait for tomorrow…

We said it at the Draft Lottery that Marcus Camby could be the option, and when you consider what the Clip Show gave up to get him, it makes sense that Walsh can get him on the cheap.

We know he was the target last year during the Z-Bo talks but was told he was unavailable, but now that he could be on the market expect Donnie to pounce.

If they add Darko, which we’ll see, and Camby, where does that leave David Lee?

1050 ESPN Radio’s “professional pest” Andrew Marchand is reporting the Knicks are in the midst of trying to land the 28th pick in this year’s draft from the Wolves.

Interesting take, yet I’m hearing that it’s going to take more than the 3 million to land the other Wolves pick, which stands at 18. Walsh was adamant the other day in saying, “I’d love to have a pick, but people aren’t running around giving them away” and also added, “you might be able to get a really good player 20 to 30.”

The Knicks need to be aggressive and it would seem that with cash considerations the 18th pick could also be in play. Walsh would love that, but it seems the 28th could be the more available option.

But I’m hearing don’t count out 18 just yet.

Draftexpress.com has Chase Budinger  at 28 and our boy  Rodrigue Beaubois at 30.  The team could also do well to snag our other boy Danny Green as well.

Also, check out 1050 on Friday as BT will have coach Mike D’Antoni.

“…The Knicks own the eighth pick in Thursday’s draft and are trying to move into the top four in order to take Rubio, the highly touted point guard from Spain. Rubio, Curry and Evans are all projected to go in the top seven.

When it comes time for the Knicks to make their pick, point guards Brandon Jennings Jrue Holiday should both be available, but people familiar with the club’s thinking claim that Donnie Walsh and Mike D’Antoni prefer Henderson, a 6-5 shooting guard from and son of the former player – and former Knick – of the same name.

The thinking among the Knicks’ brain trust is that Henderson, unlike Jennings and Holiday, has the ability to step in and make an immediate contribution. Henderson, who averaged 16.5 points last season as a junior, is regarded a strong character individual with a high basketball IQ. In a majority of mock drafts, Henderson is projected to be picked either 11th or 12th…”

Well, you know we love Henderson who has the NBA frame and athleticism to help immediately, but I can imagine the unmerciless booing should they take him. He’s a good, solid fit moving forward.

I’ve loved Will since day one and see him as a physically gifted player who plays on both ends. He can shoot and slash and is unselfish as well. All the things that can make him a perennial 15 ppg scorer along with solid rebounding,  assist and steal numbers. He’s a 25-30 minute player on a highly- competitive team.

That said, Chandler’s wavering confidence has been an issue, as has his shot selection, and his handle will never allow him to be a 2 guard in this system. As we know forcing a player out of position can rack the brain. Just ask Danny Murphy.

At the 3 he’s is a beast, and he can guard 4s so that’s where you see him sometimes. That’s an asset.  But with Al Harrington on the roster and Danilo Gallinari primed to show all those NY haters just what he has, where does that leave Chandler? Sure, Harrington is a free agent, but we know who the Knicks are saving a roster spot for. Again, Wilson is a piece to a real good team so you hold onto him because of that reason.

Wilson is a restricted free agent in 2011, and I’ve said he could be a piece to add to any possible Eddy Curry deal.

But to give up Larry Hughes and Chandler and get back two good contracts and “audition players” who can compete in Brendan Haywood and Mike James, without giving up the 8th pick well, that’s a real hard deal to pass up on.

The Knicks will have the pick of the litter between the guys whom they love and may just get 2 out of 3 of them. You’re looking at a scenario (pick two) of Stephen Curry, Ricky Rubio, Tyreke Evans, Jordan Hill, Jonny Flynn, Jrue Holiday and a host of others if things shake out right.

That, along with James and Haywood, is a better talent situation than Chandler and Hughes. It just is. Plus, if Hill is one of the picks, then it makes David Lee easier to deal for other talent (Ben Gordon?)

But there still isn’t any clarity, which is why once Walsh sees what happens in picks 2-4 he’ll have the sense of who’s there and if Will is worth giving up on. We won’t know that until Thursday.

Speaking of Walsh, I loved his press conference yesterday and the more it’s been digested the more I enjoy the man in action. Obviously, he wants the perception to be that Rubio is on the same level as some of the prospects because he wants those around the league to believe that he’s not that interested. Why would he push on Rubio now when teams ahead of him are still fielding phone calls. He’ll get aggressive, again, if Rubio is in range on Draft Night.

So in the end, if you can get a guy in James, who I love as a rugged, veteran backcourt option, and add Haywood who needs to prove he’s healthy but can at the very least protect the hoop and score along the box, along with another young piece, it may be just too tough to pass on.

But, you’d have to figure if Walsh doesn’t like how the early part shakes out, he’ll stay patient for yet another day.

Wilson Chandler, love him, hate him, or fall in between, is a productive player. Forget about the nonsense that he would not be a good player in a more traditional system. Chandler has game. He showed it under Isaiah two years ago. Last year, he was near the top of the sophomore class. As an inconsistent 21 year old, Chandler was essentially a 15 ppg and 5 rpg SF that was arguably the team’s best defender. Playing the 2, 3, or 4, Chandler was also arguably the most versatile player on the team. Right now, Chandler is a starter on a mediocre team, and perhaps the 6^th man on a championship caliber team. He is that good now, and he has the potential to be a very, VERY special player. If he was in this year’s draft (he is younger than many of the 1^st round prospects), Wilson would be a lock for the lottery, and perhaps a lock for the top 10.

So why the rumors about trading him for a player that has never played one second in the NBA? Plenty of great college players have floundered in the NBA, while many decent college players have emerged as studs in the pros. Why again are we thinking about dealing him for an unknown? The answer is simple. To be a champion, Donne Walsh might think that he has to gamble a little bit. In all likelihood, Walsh will not mess around with his 2010 plan. So that leaves him with the ability to make good draft picks and acquire underrated talent with the MLE. Walsh might be tempted to gamble away one of his most valuable chips in order to reap a bigger bounty. While Chandler has all-star potential, Walsh might want to find a kid that has all-pro potential. The Knicks need star power. Aside from the Pistons a few years ago who has multiple all-star type players, most championship teams have a mega-star. Look at this year’s Final Four. The Lakers have Kobe. The Nuggets have Melo. The Magic have Howard. The Cavs have the King. Wilson Chandler will not be one of those players. No matter how effective he has been and how much potential he has shown in his first two years as a pro. Tyreke Evans, Steph Curry, and Ricky Rubio all have that potential as pros. They all have the potential to put the Knicks on the map again. They all have the potential to be a league icon. They might not be. In fact, the odds are heavily against all three being all-pro players. Very heavily. But that would be the hope if Donnie Walsh was to trade one of only beacons of light leading the Knicks through their darkened tunnel. In trading Wilson, Donnie would hope to throw dynamite into that tunnel and to blow it out of existence.

So does Donnie go all in and gamble away Wilson Chandler for the right to draft a college player (or Rubio)? That is an extremely tough call. If Walsh could ensure a crack at Rubio, then I would probably do that. Otherwise, I would have to think long and hard about it.

History has shown that it is easier to find a player like Wilson Chandler than it is to find an elite PG. If the Knicks deal away Chandler, they will still have Al Harrington and Danilo Gallinari to man the position. If Harrington is in the long term plans, then this trade makes more sense to me. Also, come next summer, we all know that Donnie will target LeBron James, who just so happens to play the same position as Wilson Chandler. Again, that is a major gamble. Also, one of my favorites, Ron Artest is a free agent and might be lured to the idea of playing for his favorite team, even if it means playing for the MLE. There are potential replacements for Wilson Chandler.

Solution: I am not opposed to dealing away Chandler. Not in the least. I love how hard he plays, but he is inconsistent. But is dealing him for the 5^th pick getting equal value? Would including him in a deal for, perhaps, Amare Stoudemire make more sense? The Wizards rejected the idea of trading Caron Butler for Amare, and if Butler is the ceiling for Amare’s trade value, then the Knicks might be able to work something out for the star PF. The best bet for the Knicks would be to try and find a way to buy a pick before Thursday. If they can somehow acquire a mid-first round pick, they can use that to sweeten the Larry Hughes for Thomas, #5, and James pot. That is easier said than done, but that scenario could work. Or would adding Duhon / Jeffries to the mix better our offer? I am not sure. This rumor has the potential to get very interesting. But if Chandler can be moved for a bona fide star, then I am not sure that the #5 pick is worth Chandler.

Dealing Wilson Chandler for a draft pick has major boom or bust potential.
Walsh has been around this league and this game to understand that it does not matter where a player gets drafted in the draft. It matters if that player can actually play.If the 5th overall pick can play better than Wilson, then go for it. If not, then do not. It is as simple as that. I’ll trust Donnie on this one.