- I think the biggest thing I took from watching “Winning Time” was the
depiction of Larry Brown and why he ultimately can only remain with certain teams for relatively short periods of time:
Players don’t the guy, but you don’t have to really like someone to have success in this league.
I really appreciated Reggie Miller saying that the Pacer players couldn’t stand Brown, whom he dubbed a perfectionist “in an imperfect game.” Brown expects the game to be played the right way and the Pacers really did play the right way. Of course he does, he’s a snob, he went to North Carolina. Reggie must have felt the same way about how he did things, UCLA knows a thing or two about hoops. Ultimately, the Pacers lacked superior talent but, like the Knicks, never took a possession off and played as one until they needed Reggie to make shots.
In reference to the team not liking Brown, Miller followed with the comment that the players “had to do the right thing.” Spike Lee irony aside, doing the right thing is such a novel concept isn’t it? Make no mistake, by “doing the right thing” Miller meant “internally when it came to the organization the players would shut up, not bitch, come to work every day and play hard,” which they did.
I hear a lot of people defend Stephon Marbury in regards to how Mike D’Antoni handled his situation. It’s a fair point. D’Antoni, it appears, had no intention of playing Marbury and should have told him that much or at least someone in the organization should have given him the word. Maybe D’Antoni was open to playing him until Steph learned he wasn’t going to start and Starbury popped off. Who knows.
What we do know is that Steph popped off to Larry Brown, and it made for an uncomfortable locker room. Steph openly called out Brown for questioning his manhood, a practice that Brown made famous for with Chauncey Billups and Allen Iverson- who both made it to the Finals with Brown on the sidelines.
We also know that Steph went off on Isiah. There were rumors that Antonio Davis, a veteran to Brown’s act, was mocked during his time in NY and demanded a trade. Imagine that. A veteran of the Knicks-Pacers battles and a real professional, was ostracized for being, well, professional. I’m not saying I know what happened, but based on plenty of conversations, I have an idea. And that’s not to single out Steph who was the franchise player and relished the role, it’s simply to make the point that Brown’s Pacers, as well as his effort with the 76ers in 2001 and obviously the Detroit Pistons in 2004, exemplified doing “right thing.” And it highlights just how wretched the Knicks locker room was during Brown’s one year here. The coach’s rift with Thomas, to me, had more to do with Larry saying, “what on earth have you assembled here?” and less to do with “I’m a tyrant.”
What does that mean for this edition of the team? Well, I think it’s justifiable to have questions about the coach. I believe he wants players to do the “right thing” but he can’t enforce it. At the end of the day there has to be a belief that even though you may not like your coach you can still play at a really high level and the Pacers and virtually every team Brown ever coached, except the Knicks, proved that.
- So Toney Douglas now has the chance that everyone has been asking for and I’m happy for him. It has been talked about often that D’Antoni’s rational behind playing Chris Duhon was twofold. One, it was because he was an efficient assist-turnover player (stats wise- I, of course, maintain that bad shots on a poor offensive rebounding team count as turnovers and Duhon’s pulls from 3 several time per game should have been tacked on to his A/T ratio), but secondly because D’Antoni hopes Duhon, and other veterans, can sign contracts next year. (more…)